IA: Europe is still tightening a screw, but at what price?
The European Union has a new decisive step in AI. After starting the foundations in February, Brussels, which today the active second part of its AI act directly focuses on the models for general use as a chatgpt. A control offensive that divides players in this industry.
In short
- The EU strengthens its regulation by focusing on generals, imposing transparency, traceability and respect for copyright.
- Meta rejects these rules, reversed with its mixed competitors in the face of European regulatory pressure.
- This new supervision is part of the growing technological rivalry between Brussels and Washington.
The EU imposes on AI new obligations as Chatgpt
The countdown ended. This Saturday, the European Union activates the second phase of its law AI, this time focuses on artificial intelligence models for general use – such as Chatgpt, Claude or Gemini.
This new regulatory chapter extends the system initiated on February 2, which set the basics of legal management AI by disabling certain practices considered a high risk, such as social assessment or exploitation of vulnerable people.
From now on, the requirements are accurate and reinforced. The developers of these AI will have to guarantee compliance with copyright, confirm the origin of the generated content and stop the massive extraction of personal data. Haine and discriminatory manifestations will also have to be actively filtered.
This European regulatory authority is part of a tense geopolitical context. While the United States favors self -regulation and accelerates China without democratic restrictions, Europe bet on AI supervision.
Laying that could make jurisprudence on a global scale, such as GDPR, which has established itself as an international legacy.
The Brussels strategy is therefore clear: who wants to do business in Europe will have to respect its rules. A form of masked digital protectionism aimed at again balance the balance of power with American technology giants.
Unlike Microsoft or Google, which are more conciliation, the meta will choose a frontal confrontation.
Mark Zuckerberg categorically refuses to comply with European requirements and prefers betting on direct confrontation with Brussels.
This meta resistance is explained by colossal financial problems. New European rules directly threaten the economic model of the company based on the massive use of personal data and creating artificial intelligence content (AI).
Indeed, for meta, the sub -laws of the law would be a limitation of its capacity for innovation and offering competitive advantages to their less conscientious rivals.
On the part of the experts, opinions differ in the actual effectiveness of this regulation. Some consider it a simple communication exercise for companies, allowing them to give them a “positive appearance” without major restrictions.
Others believe in this regulatory battle Europe is playing a large, although it means risking that US giants will instruct the European market.
This war of trenches between meta and Europe perfectly illustrates the growing tension between European digital sovereignty and American technological hegemony.
The AI plant prevails, which could redefine the global balance of the digital economy and determine which of the unrestrained innovation or supervised ethics will win.
Europe is definitely progressed, transmitted by the ideal of ethical administration of artificial intelligence. However, this lonely way, between legal restrictions and strategic ambitions, could even be isolated the old continent. The real problem today is no longer only to regulate AI, but to do so without sacrificing innovation or loss of technological influence.
Maximize your Cointribne experience with our “Read to Earn” program! For each article you read, get points and approach exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start to accumulate benefits.
Passionate Bitcoin, I like to explore meanders blockchain and cryptos and share my discoveries with the community. My dream is to live in a world where privacy and financial freedom is guaranteed for everyone, and I firmly believe that Bitcoin is a tool that can make it possible.
Renunciation
The words and opinions expressed in this article are involved only by their author and should not be considered investment counseling. Do your own research before any investment decision.